VIEWPOINT: Rule of Law is in Fashion

Lately, one can be forgiven for thinking that the phrase “rule of law” was the name of some new fashion item that has taken over the market. It seems to have become the perfect accessory to peddling ones own agenda, to give it some weight.

It is used like the perfect high heeled shoe, thrown into every disagreement in the hope that it stamps out the opponent and wins you the argument. It is used as a shiny outfit, to dress up ones problematic opinions and views.

Most times, people don’t even explain what part of the rule of law is supposedly at risk—they just toss the phrase into the mix, hoping it sticks.

The truth is, rule of law is not some fashionable magic slogan to be used loosely and irresponsibly. It is a fundamental principle that ensures everyone is subject to the same laws and that those laws are applied fairly and consistently. It means that no one is above the law.

The use of this principle demands clarity and respect. When one claims to be concerned about the rule of law, but does not point out exactly what aspect of it is cause for concern, it weakens the argument.

Now when the phrase is used carelessly to advance an agenda, disguised through the use of an organisations name and reputation, therein is another whole level of problematic. Such a feat is not courage—it is cover. If one has something to say, say it loud and proud and take ownership of it. For if ones concern has legitimacy, there is no need to dress it up and mask it.

Frankly, it is laughable when the phrase “rule of law” is thrown around like confetti at every issue.

It has become the go-to phrase for those who lack substance but want authority. But what is even more laughable is when people disguise their personal views under the banner of a another’s name. It does a disservice to the very principle they claim to defend.

The rule of law deserves better than to be reduced to a catchphrase for personal battles.